أستغفر الله العظيم ... سبحان الله وبحمده



العودة   منتديات داماس > البوابه الهندسية > مشاريع هندسية DWG


مواضيع مميزة  


آخر عشرة مواضيع المواضيع النشطة


17-08-2014, 11:16 AM
سعد الدين متصل
المسؤول الفني
رقم العضوية: 3
تاريخ التسجيل: Mar 2003
الإقامة: Türkiye
المشاركات: 40,914
إعجاب: 9,082
تلقى 15,567 إعجاب على 5,204 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 5097 موضوع
    #1  

Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Building


Analysis Design Multi-Storey Building

كتاب
Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Building
Analysis Design Multi-Storey Building



Content
AutoCad Drawing
Drawing and Column Layout Plane.dwg
Footing Detailes.dwg
Foundation Plan.dwg
Slabs drawings.dwg


Software files
ETABS Files
Safe
STAAD Files


Theory



This report content the analysis and design of hospital building. Modelling and Analysis were done using software ETABS 9.5 AND STAAD Pro 2005.
The project work mainly consists of:


ESTIMATION OF LOADS (AS PER UBC-1997).
SLAB DESIGN USING MS-EXCEL WORKSHEETS
3D MODELLING OF A FRAME STRUCTURE, USING ETABS 9.5 & STAAD.PRO-2005.
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF THE FRAME USING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SOFTWARE ETABS 9.5 & STAAD.PRO-2005.
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF ETABS 9.5 & STAAD PRO 2005.
DESIGN OF STAIR CASE
SEISMIC ANALYSIS ACCORDING TO UBC-1997


The structural design of this building includes important components like floor slabs, beams, columns, footings, stair case etc. ACI CODES 2002 (ACI -318-02) and UBC-1997 have been followed for designing.
The current project report is an application of all the knowledge of Structural Engineering at undergraduate level. The analysis and design of Hospital Building is done by using ETABS 9.5 & STAAD PRO 2005. Slabs & stairs have been design by MS Excel Sheets, similarly footings is designed by using SAFE.
The main objective of the project was to design the Hospital Building by ETABS & STAAD and compare their results. As for the results it has been found that ETABS giving more economical structure. While using the both well known software in market we observed that it is better to use ETABS for simple building as that were in our case.
Summery of the Report


The STAAD gives more conservative design then ETABS, as the reactions given by STAAD are more then ETABS, also the end forces at the ends of beam and column given by STAAD are more than ETABS.
ETABS designs are more economic then STAAD.
In the ETABS we can model slabs and mesh them, without the breaking of beams into small pieces. But in STAAD if we model plate and mesh it, the beams also break into small pieces, which is not desire and it also increase the size of out put file. So we have to calculate the self weight of slabs and add it to the applied loads.
Both ETABS and STAAD give input file but in STAAD we can easily work in the input file while modeling.
The modeling in the ETABS is easy as compared to STAAD.
ETABS have option like “auto end offsets” which is not included in STAAD.
Both software give output files in text form both are easily printable and copy able.
In STAAD we can model footing, but only the individual footings but ETAB cannot design footings.
The ETABS results tables shows the value of shear at distance d from the face of support and the value of critical moment at the face of the column support. But the STAAD results tables shows the value of both shear and moment at the extreme ends. To view the values at different locations there is option in both ETABs and STAAD.
ETABS is most suitable for building frame systems as it is EXTENDED 3D ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BUILDINGS SYSTEMS.


Recommendations of the Report in Brief
Both the software are universally used and well known. Both have their own limitations and assumptions for design therefore results are different of both the software. The results of STAAD are more than ETABS due to it stricter limitations.
The goal of our comparison was not that, to approve or disprove any software but to check the differences in the results and to try to find the reason of these differences. The design of ETABS is economic due to its less conservative approach as compared to STAAD, and due to its easy working we find ETAAB better than STAAD.
Content of the Package
Also this package includes all analysis files (Staad.Pro and ETABS) and autocad drawings of the building.



49MB

Download


http://mediafire.com/download/02/002/Analysis.a...y.Building.rar





المواضيع المشابهه
الموضوع كاتب الموضوع المنتدى مشاركات آخر مشاركة
I want design example of multi storey building by ACI code yaseen wsu التطبيقات الهندسية 2 17-04-2017 08:39 PM
Design and Analysis of 20 Storey Building in ETABS سعد الدين كورسات برامج الهندسة 8 27-10-2016 11:13 AM
طلب design example of multi storey building yaseen wsu كتب هندسة مدني, معماري, ميكانيك وغيرهم 2 29-09-2014 08:04 AM
Analysis of Multi-Storey Building using SAP2000 سعد الدين كورسات برامج الهندسة 3 13-09-2014 06:51 PM
Seismic Analysis and Design of a Six Storey RCC Building سعد الدين كتب هندسة مدني, معماري, ميكانيك وغيرهم 2 20-07-2014 01:45 AM
17-08-2014, 08:27 PM
محـــمد ظافـــر غير متصل
مجموعة الإدارة
رقم العضوية: 161559
تاريخ التسجيل: Sep 2008
الإقامة: Malaysia
المشاركات: 28,486
إعجاب: 4,005
تلقى 8,194 إعجاب على 1,508 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 3544 موضوع
    #2  
بارك الله فيك وجزاك خيرا اخي العزيز



21-08-2014, 10:09 AM
fadi70 غير متصل
الوسـام الذهبي
رقم العضوية: 424116
تاريخ التسجيل: Jun 2013
المشاركات: 1,557
إعجاب: 783
تلقى 27 إعجاب على 13 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 587 موضوع
    #3  
بارك الله فيك


‏اللَّهُمَّ إِنَّكَ عَفُوٌّ كَرِيمٌ تُحِبُّ الْعَفْوَ فَاعْفُ عَنِّا

14-09-2014, 11:25 AM
raedms غير متصل
VIP
رقم العضوية: 81535
تاريخ التسجيل: May 2007
المشاركات: 23,958
إعجاب: 618
تلقى 4,106 إعجاب على 733 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 1331 موضوع
    #4  
جزاك الله خيرا اخي العزيز


سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم


14-09-2014, 12:29 PM
محـــمد ظافـــر غير متصل
مجموعة الإدارة
رقم العضوية: 161559
تاريخ التسجيل: Sep 2008
الإقامة: Malaysia
المشاركات: 28,486
إعجاب: 4,005
تلقى 8,194 إعجاب على 1,508 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 3544 موضوع
    #5  
بارك الله فيك اخي العزيز أبو محمد

16-06-2016, 12:43 PM
atul engineer غير متصل
عضو جديد
رقم العضوية: 681367
تاريخ التسجيل: Oct 2015
الإقامة: I am from india working in Saudi Arabia
المشاركات: 22
إعجاب: 9
تلقى 3 إعجاب على 2 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 0 موضوع
    #8  
thanks


18-08-2016, 11:02 AM
choti غير متصل
عضو مشارك
رقم العضوية: 809677
تاريخ التسجيل: Aug 2016
المشاركات: 29
إعجاب: 0
تلقى 0 إعجاب على 0 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 0 موضوع
    #9  
thank you

21-08-2016, 12:37 PM
كمال بدر غير متصل
الوسـام الماسـي
رقم العضوية: 435810
تاريخ التسجيل: Nov 2013
الإقامة: جمهورية مصـر العربية
المشاركات: 21,393
إعجاب: 5,004
تلقى 5,578 إعجاب على 2,864 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 953 موضوع
    #10  

جزاكَ الله خيراً أخي الكريم عن هذا الطرح القيم والنافع والمفيد ... تقبل تحياتي.



سُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ وَبِحَمْدِهِ ،-، سُبْحَانَ اللَّه الْعَظِيم

موضوعات العبد الفقير إلى الله الغنى بالله المتوكل على الله.



24-08-2016, 06:52 PM
fbennettst غير متصل
عضو جديد
رقم العضوية: 794798
تاريخ التسجيل: Jul 2016
الإقامة: MEXICO CITY
المشاركات: 15
إعجاب: 0
تلقى 0 إعجاب على 0 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 0 موضوع
    #11  
the best

18-09-2016, 12:34 AM
atul engineer غير متصل
عضو جديد
رقم العضوية: 681367
تاريخ التسجيل: Oct 2015
الإقامة: I am from india working in Saudi Arabia
المشاركات: 22
إعجاب: 9
تلقى 3 إعجاب على 2 مشاركة
تلقى دعوات الى: 0 موضوع
    #12  
The major problem in sap and Etab is that there is no direct tool to measure the node to node distances and this is very annoying. Where as in staad it is very easy to measure distance.
In least version of staad pro SS6 with Building planner modeling is also easy. Just make centre line plan in autocad and import. Loads are applied automatically. It saves lot of time. After analysis the staad file is taken into RCDC -5to obtain Bar Bending schedule and shop drawings. The whole process is automated. RC Dc also supports Etab file but we have save it as mdb file .

I think in most of situations staad is best and esay to use interface and also learning curve is also small. In India staad results are preferred in Government Departments.


In middle east Sap-2000 and Etabs are prefered.

 


Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Building

English

Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The owner and operator of the site is not responsible for the availability of, or any content provided.
Topics that are written in the site reflect the opinion of the author.
جميع ما يُطرح من مواضيع ومشاركات تعبر عن رأي كاتبها ولا تعبر عن رأي مالك الموقع أو الإدارة بأي حال من الأحوال.